Which verb means to use ambiguous language to avoid committing to a position?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $25.99Unlock all

Enhance your Honors English III Vocabulary skills. Master challenging vocabulary with our quiz: flashcards, multiple choice, and instant feedback. Prepare confidently for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which verb means to use ambiguous language to avoid committing to a position?

Explanation:
Equivocate is the verb for using language that’s deliberately ambiguous to avoid taking a definite position. When someone equivocates, they hedge, dodge a direct yes or no, and lean on vague terms like “possibly” or “it depends” to keep from committing to a stance. This is different from clarifying (making something clear), explaining (providing reasons or details), or discussing (talking about a topic in a way that often aims for clarity). An example would be a spokesperson who says there are “pros and cons to consider” without stating whether they support the policy, thus avoiding commitment.

Equivocate is the verb for using language that’s deliberately ambiguous to avoid taking a definite position. When someone equivocates, they hedge, dodge a direct yes or no, and lean on vague terms like “possibly” or “it depends” to keep from committing to a stance. This is different from clarifying (making something clear), explaining (providing reasons or details), or discussing (talking about a topic in a way that often aims for clarity). An example would be a spokesperson who says there are “pros and cons to consider” without stating whether they support the policy, thus avoiding commitment.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy